Author Topic: Articles By Bhisma Kukreti - श्री भीष्म कुकरेती जी के लेख  (Read 722002 times)

Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                    Badrinath and Other Places   
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -153
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -173
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1007
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)
 At the right hilly area of Alaknanda  (Hamilton used Vishnu Ganga) there is  Badrinath . There were 20-30 huts. Temple priests and workers lived on those huts. The temple was famous all over India and there were villages for income to the temple. However, the temple architect was a simple one. The height was 40-50 feet. The top was ‘Amalak’ was small and was surrounded by bronz plates with a small top by gold. Hamilton wrote with sarcasm that the temple was made by eternal power and when there was earth quake in 1803 human hands had to protect it. Daulat Rav Sindia rebuilt the temple.
               Hamilton informed that 50000 annual pilgrims used to visit the temple in summer. However, Trail stated that the numbers was 27000 in 1820 and income was 15750 rupees excluding gold and silver and the other income was from 170 Garhwal villages and 56 Kumaon villages.
                                                Other Places
       There were a few huts in Rudraprayag.
          There were 6-8 houses in Karna Prayag. Karna idol was there in a Math.
     In 1820, Nandprayag was a barren place. The traders used to come there temporarily. People used to show a couple of idols on stones to pilgrims.
     There were 150 houses in Mana village. The houses were built by stone with wooden roofs. Mana people used to migrate in south valleys in winter.  There were 22 villages in Dhaulaghati and villagers used to come down in winter.
         Gamsalo, Malari and Niti were main villages. There were 40 houses in Gamsalo. Houses were built by stone with wood logs. A couple of houses were four story. Roof were wooden. Domestic animals were tagged on ground floors. Balconies were made by wood with engraved idols of Ganesh or other deities. Those inhabitants were called Marchha or Dobasa.
  Kotdwara was known for police post. Doggadda and Lansdowne were in established at that time.
XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 332-456
2 Hamilton, Description of Hindustan, Vol 2, page 639-48


Xx













Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                     Glimpse of Maniyarsyun Villages   
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -156
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -174
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1008
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)

       The 99% population lived in villages. There were 2929 villages in British Garhwal in 1822.   The estimated agriculture area was 57432X20 Nali.
            Captain Hardwick (Asiatic researches) described worse conditions of Garhwal villages in 1796. It is definite that the condition in Garhwal would be worsened in Gorkha period.
   Hardwick writes – I entered in a village Kotdwara on 20th April 1796. There was a wooden door and a check post at entry. Ahead of Kotdwara the road to Garhwal was rough.  I crossed Amsaur and  Ghinoli (Gainolo) villages. There were 3 huts in Ghinoli. There were 3-4 huts in each village from Kotdwara to Shrinagar. It was a rare scene for watching 5-6 huts in a village. The village was called big if there were 9-10 huts. I reached to Dias (Dyusa )village from Ghinoli. From Dyusa, I reached to Bilkhet. It is clear that all the villages in between Dyusi to Bilkhet were settled after British rule started.
     From Bilkhet, I reached to Naithana village. Irt and poverty was there in Naithana. Ahead of Naithana, there was a ruined hut in Advani. Tourists used to take rest there. Further to Advani, there was one hut in Teka ka Manda. I could se one or two huts on crossing hill villages. The villages were human less and poor. Mostly, wild animals were there instead of human settlements.
  In Gorkha era, more than 2 lakhs Garhwalis were forced to flee Garhwal (either for sales or they fled). Due to mass flee, most of villages were deserted.
XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 332-456
2 Hamilton, Description of Hindustan, Vol 2, page 639-48
3- Asiatic Researches Vol.1, page 324-330


Xx







Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                     Glimpse of Dabralsyun  and Dhangu  Villages   in 1812
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -157
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -177
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1009
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)

 In 1812, there were following details of huts in each village of Dabralsyun and Talla Dhangu under Dhangu Kamin (Dabral)-
  Village ------  Number of Huts--------- Village ------  Number of Huts
Gauli - ------------ 7--------------------------Kuntani -----------5
Davoli- -------------6---------------------------Amaldu--------4
Masirkot------------1----------------------------- Masogi -----4
Khaman-------------5----------------------------------Nadu---13
Jogyana--------------4--------------------------------Kothakhola ----3
Kothar ---------------12---------------------------------Syanlgaun-----5
Dobari----------------2----------------------------------Dikhet-----4
Kheda ----------------2----------------------------------Pabyakh------3
Deubadi--------------2-------------------------------------Judd----3
Dhaunri ---------------8---------------------------------- Dabar ---9
Timli----------------5---------------------------------------Dangla ---4
Jamal -----------------3----------------------------------------Syanl-----10
Jalth-------------------5----------------------------------Kathur---5
Dhari------------------10---------------------------------Dhasi-----7
Dhounr---------------7-----------------------------------Manjokhi ----9
Kund--------------------9-----------------------------------Khera----4
Nauth--------------------2---------------------------------Mall ----11
Nakuri---------------------6 --------------------------------Kota---9
Palel ----------------------4---------------------------------- Bijani---13
Ucchakot ---------------9
  In Gorkha rule, other village details already detailed.




XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 332-456
2 Hamilton, Description of Hindustan, Vol 2, page 639-48
3- Asiatic Researches Vol.1, page 324-330
4- Dabral, ibid page 343, from Autar Singh Butola Rawat Library


Bageshwar  Kumaon, Uttarakhand ; Patwari , Civil Police History of British Rule, Forest settlement,  Administration, Policies, Revenue system over Haridwar, Pithoragarh Kumaon, Uttarakhand;   














Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                     Remigration of Garhwalis from Plains
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -158
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -178
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1010
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)

   Before, British rule started, in Gorkha rule, thousands of Garhwalis migrated to plains of India.
    The news spread about suitable and better British administration than local Kings all over India. Migrated Garhwalis also came to know about citizen oriented rule in British Garhwal. Migrated Garhwalis started coming back to their villages. Salves sold by Gorkha could not return back. Most of their huts were intact as they left. Retuned Garhwalis had to repair their huts and resettled there .Their land was now, barren. With efforts, they remade land suitable for farming. No authorities stopped them for regaining their rights.
    However, in some cases, where the land was super fertile, Sayanas, and strongmen in absence of owners captured the land those escaped from their villages. When they returned the new owners did not offer back their land. 
  Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat informed to Dr Dabral an incident of Gujdu patti. A family had to flees from Ruindali Bhandar village in 1810 as the family could not pay tax.when in 1821, the family returned, they saw that Kamin established another rKhaikar on that land. The case came before Trail in 1833.
 




XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-44 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection

















Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                    Kamin, Sayana or Regional Villages Chiefs 
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -159
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -179
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1011
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)

    Kamin , Sayana played important role in establishing villages in initial period of British rule. They established many new villages and signed ‘Kaul Patta (agreement) for paying tax on behalf of villages under their jurisdiction. There was barren land everywhere in Garhwal and population was scanty. Most of villagers did not have resources for plow , seeds and arranging agricultural appliances. Most of villagers did not have money for paying tax. Kmin and Sayan paid tax in money on their behalf. Kamin supplied seeds, agro-appliances to their farmers and help them for erecting huts. Kamin through luring or through threats, used to make situation for famrers that they stay in the village.
XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-44 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection















Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                    Shilpkar (Craftsmen), Harijan  or Scheduled Castes of Garhwal in 1865   
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -160
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -180
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1012
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)
    Before, independent, craftsmen caste was called ‘Doom or Dome’. Now, this word is unconstitutional.
  There was heavy demand for craftsmen (Shilpkar or S.C.) , farmers  under contract (Tihari) and women. The service providing community was craftsmen or Shilpkar society. Upper Caste farers required shilpkar for big or small farming , hut building and other activities.
          There were two major classes of Shilpkar or Harijan.
    Dancers, singers and music instrument players came under Entertaining class as Badi, Auji, Bhat, Hurkya.
  People require entertaining class at auspicious occasions.
   Auji was important class as they were Dhol-Damau players. Auhi had seven or ten villages under them.
 On every first day of month, Auji used to play Dhol-Damau at every courtyard. In marriage or other auspicious day, Auji used to play Dhol –Damau.
 Badi was another important entertaining community. They were dancers and singers.       
     Under real Craftsmen class were iron smith, metal smith, carpenters, and producers of various home- farm appliances nd labors for various activities.
   Shilpkar used to make wood, bamboo utensils and other utensils.   Shilpkar used to plow fields and also they erected farms by digging jungles. They used to carry grooms and brides at marriage procession through pinus or Dola.
 It was a must to have one or two Shilpkar families in each village.
 Kamin brought Harijan from here and there and established them in each village. Kamin were responsible for providing labor to British officers in their tour to rural regions. Kamin used to send Shilpkar/Harijan for that work. 
 The population of British Garhwal (todays’ Pauri, Chamoli and Rudraprayag) was 248742 in 1860 and out of this the Shilpkar ? Harijan population was 35992.
           
   
   

XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-44 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection
2-Joshi, Khas Family law
















Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                   
                     Women in British Garhwal
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -161
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -181
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1013
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)
.
            The woman was important asset for agriculture works and pasturing works. Womn was also useful for kitchen works that was not possible by Harijan or Shilpkar. Becket reported that she was capable of working for 60 years and used to produce up to 50 years. Women were not allowed plowing.
 The following population figures confirm that there was shortage of women in Garhwal –
 Year ---------------------Male Pop------------------------Female Population
1841-------------------------71534---------------------------60882
1853--------------------------- 120027------------------------113299
 That was why there was a custom of Takka marriage or offering money to bride’s father by groom’s family and without marriage procession and rituals. ‘Kanyadan was custom in upper caste and prosperous Thakur.  Prosperous man had many wives. Wives were there for works. In case of death of elder brother, younger brother used to marry /keep his Bhauj.  Far devar were ready for keeping widow Bhauj (elder brother’s wife). There was demand for ‘Dhanti female (thrown out of family). Marrying with widow Bhauj or Dhanti was very useful in remaking of barren land useful for agriculture.
  Many widows had land but there were no males for them in family. For solving such problems, women started keeping ‘husband’.
            More the children was sign of prosperity because children were useful for agriculture works. If any mn married with married women the new husband hd to pay money to ex-husband. 
 
   
   

XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-44 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection
2-Joshi, Khas Family law
3- Paw- Garhwal Settlement page 44
4-Becket, Garhwal resettlement report - 29




















Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                   
                    Search for Tenant Farmers
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -162
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -182
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1014
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)
.
  The major land in Garhwal was barren when British entered into Garhwal. Kamin or Sayane were interested for settling tenants in the cultivated or barren land.  There were tenants those were habitual of shifting one place to other. Therefore, Kamin started luring the tenants (Asami).
  The basic reasons for farmers (owner or tenants) were wild animals as tigers, leopards killing human beings and animals as deer, bores, bears, destroying the crops. There were epidemics in some particular regions for farmers for migrating other regions. The floods, drought, landslides  were also other causes for farmers leaving the places.
   Many people indulged in social norms crimes as marrying outcast or society compelled men for leaving their caste and in such cases, they had to flee their respective village for protection from social punishment. Many times, blind faith was also reason for a farmer shifting from one village to other village.
  Kamin /Sayana were trying their best for farmer tenants settling in their area.

XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-77 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection
2-Joshi, Khas Family law
3- Paw- Garhwal Settlement page 44
4-Batton t, Garhwal resettlement report - 29























Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                   
                    Freedom for Deforestation
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -163
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -183
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1015
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)
    There was no farming on agriculture land for many years in most of the cases in Gurkha rule. Therefore, cultivated land was as good as barren or forest. Due to scanty population the villages nearby land was nothing but dense forest in most of the cases. The authorities as Trail and Batten allowed villagers for acquiring forest land that used to be cultivated before many years. On such land, there were ruined walls of past agricultural land. Non pasturing was also a cause for growing forest.     After farmers under Kamins started re working on barren land, deforestation started the nearby village land too .Pasturing helped in reducing the forest density. Batten allowed farmers for making forest land into farming land and ordered for  Kamin not interfere in such cases. The land made for agriculture was under ownership of government so, there was no right of Kamin on such land. Batten declared that by that act the numbers of wild animals would come down. People started transforming forest land in agriculture land.
     Wild animals were dangerous for killing human beings. Beckett reported that from 1850-1863, in Garhwal, wild animals killed 155 males and 121 females (total 276). Government started rewarding hunters for killing wild animals by depositing animal skin in Tehsil. By killing edible wild animals, people had two benefits – food and reward.
   Beckett reported the following rewards for killing wild animals between 1850-1863-
Size--------Tiger------------Leopards ------------Bear ----------Total --------Award money in Rs.
Big---------77 -------------------1229--------------2071------------3377
Small-------14--------------------171-----------------531-------------716
Total ------91--------------------1400-----------------2602-----------4093-------13784 and four ana
XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-77 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection
2-Joshi, Khas Family law
3- Paw- Garhwal Settlement page 44
4-Batton t, Garhwal resettlement report – 521-529
5-Becket , Garhwal Settlement Report page 35























Bhishma Kukreti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,808
  • Karma: +22/-1
                   
                    Increase in Village Numbers and Agro-Land 
                  British Administration in Garhwal   -164
       -
History of British Rule/Administration over Kumaun and Garhwal (1815-1947) -184
-
 
            History of Uttarakhand (Garhwal, Kumaon and Haridwar) -1016
-
                              By: Bhishma Kukreti (History Student)
 As soon as Trail had agreement with Kamin and Thokdar for land ownership Kmin and Thokdar started establishing tanents /Khaikar farmers in villages. Padhan aloso started occupying land and started establishing Khaikar. There was sizable increase in numbers of villages and agriculture land. There was increase in revenue too.
 From 1815-1864, there was freedom for encroaching forest land and barren fields for cultivation. Becket informed that till measurement through land settlement was not completed it was difficult for taking tx from the new cultivated land or nayaavad bhumi. Becket wrote that till 1840, people were poor. Government created new district as Garhwal and slowly the situation started changing. People started keeping guns and started occupying nearby village land for their uses. People occupied whole valley  for cultivation.
  There were following reasons for increase in agro-land-

1-People started re-cultivation on old but barren land.
2-Making nearby forest as cultivated land
3- Cutting forests and digging land for cultivation
  There were 2929 villages and 57432X20 Path occupied land in 1822. There was 30135 20Path land that was barren lan.  By 1838, the village numbers were 4103 and cultivated land 90000 X20 Path.
   The process making forest as cultivated land was called Katol. People used to cut forest in winter and used to burn the same. In monsoon, people used to dig land for agriculture use by Kuti. People used to sow Til sesame seeds etc. For three for years, farmers used to do temporary faming of sesame or turmeric. Then they used to make contours and made the land use for other crops. 
  Becket offered following details for cultivated land and village increase-
  Year --------------No.Villages------------  Cultivated land (in 20 Path)
1822--------------------2929-----------------------57432
1824---------------------2929----------------------76340 (including old barren land)
1840---------------------4103----------------------89653 (excluding Bhotia)
1864 -------------------4395 +22-------------------149379   

XXX   
References 
1-Shiv Prasad Dabral ‘Charan’, Uttarakhand ka Itihas, Part -7 Garhwal par British -Shasan, part -1, page- 343-77 from Vishnu Singh Gorla Rawat collection
2-Joshi, Khas Family law
3- Paw- Garhwal Settlement page 44
4-Batton t, Garhwal resettlement report – 521-529
5-Becket , Garhwal Settlement Report page 35

























 

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22